What is not a consideration in determining the legitimacy of an engagement according to the law of armed conflict?

In the context of the law of armed conflict, determining the legitimacy of an engagement involves several key principles that govern the conduct of hostilities. These principles are designed to ensure that military operations are conducted in a manner that is both ethical and lawful.

Military necessity refers to the necessity of taking certain actions to achieve a legitimate military objective. It allows for actions that are necessary to defeat the enemy but disallows those that are not needed for the accomplishment of that goal.

Discrimination, also known as distinction, is a fundamental principle that mandates the differentiation between combatants and non-combatants. It aims to protect civilian populations and civilian objects from the effects of armed conflicts by ensuring that military operations target only military objectives.

Proportionality is another key consideration that ensures that the anticipated collateral damage to civilians and civilian infrastructure is not excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated from the attack.

Political alignment, however, is not a legal consideration in determining the legitimacy of an engagement. The principles of the law of armed conflict focus on the nature of the military action itself and the protection of those not participating in hostilities, rather than on the political affiliations or motivations behind the engagements. This distinction is crucial for maintaining ethical standards in warfare and ensuring that